William Lane Craig Refutes A Vehement Attack on the Atonement

About this sermon

Sean McDowell interviews Dr. Craig on Andrew Rillera’s book, Lamb of the Free, which is a vehement attack on penal substitutionary atonement. Sadly, the book has been widely hailed by indiscriminating readers. Rillera’s objection is not, like most critiques, aimed at the “penal” aspect of penal substitutionary atonement, but at the “substitutionary” and “atonement” aspects of the theory. He denies not only that Jesus died in our place but, remarkably, that his death atoned for our sins! Dr. Craig takes the mistaken views espoused by Rillera head on in this critique. Special thanks to @SeanMcDowell for this interview and footage. READ: Atonement and the Death of Christ, by W.L. Craig (https://amzn.to/49I93An) For more resources visit: https://www.reasonablefaith.org We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums: https://www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/ Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips: https://www.youtube.com/drcraigvideos Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: https://twitter.com/rfupdates Like the Reasonable Faith Facebook Fan Page: https://www.facebook.com/reasonablefaithorg 00:00 - Teaser & Intro 01:24 - What Is Penal Substitutionary Atonement and what is it important? 02:42 - Rillera’s unusual critique of penal substitution 07:40 - Five pivotal mistakes in Rillera's approach 14:35 - The levitical animal sacrifices aren't substitutionary? 20:04 - The biological death of the animal is not about death? 24:40 - OT ways around a blood sacrifice 28:27 - Sacrifice is not about suffering 32:10 - Interpreting Passover 34:40 - Interpreting the Lord's Supper 40:50 - Why did Jesus have to die? 42:30 - Interesting questions 46:20 - Is penal substitutionary atonement necessary as a biblical theory?

Topics

• Jesus Christ