“What Would It Take for You to Believe?” The Question That Exposes Bias

About this sermon

Can you honestly investigate Jesus if you rule out miracles before examining the evidence? 🤔✝️ In this episode, J. Warner Wallace exposes the circular reasoning that can keep people from taking Christianity seriously: “Miracles never happen, therefore every report of a miracle must be false.” But if the question is whether God exists—and whether Jesus is who He claimed to be—you cannot fairly begin by excluding the supernatural from the possible answers. You’ll learn: • Why rejecting miracles in advance is not neutral investigation 🔍 • How a presuppositional bias against the supernatural shapes the way people interpret evidence • Why “What would it take for you to believe?” is such a revealing question • How even a dramatic personal experience can be dismissed when someone is committed to naturalism first • Why some friends may not be moving toward Christianity, even after hearing the evidence 📖 The goal is not to force belief or win every conversation. It is to help people recognize their assumptions, examine the claims of Jesus fairly, give good reasons for Christianity, and let God do the rest. ❤️ 👉 Get my book, Cold-Case Christianity: https://amzn.to/42XtJhu 👉 Visit Cold Case Christianity for free videos, articles, and Christian apologetics resources: https://coldcasechristianity.com 👍 If this helped you think more clearly about miracles and evidence, please LIKE this video. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE and turn on notifications for more videos on Christian apologetics, the evidence for Jesus, and the case for Christianity. 💬 Share this with someone who says, “I would believe if God just showed me something.”

Topics

• Faith